Thursday 23 April 2015

Blog 5: Ethics Of Gene Editing

Blog 5: Ethics Of Gene Editing


            In this week’s class we learned about the importance of personhood, human rights, and the justice system. Today, I'm going to focus on what it means to be a person and what we consider to be human. Our book describes a person is someone who is capable of psychological and social interactions with others, capable of deciding on a course of action and being held responsible for that action (Rosenstand, 321).  However, when you dive a little deeper, being human can be described as so much more than that.  In the United States, it's illegal to have an abortion once a mother passes her 24th week of pregnancy, because that's when scientists decided a fetus becomes a person. This has been widely debated especially among religious fanatics, because who's to say life doesn't begin on a cellular level?
            This opens us up into the topic of in ethics in the human genome. Reports have swept the world today announcing that a University in Guangzhou attempted to edit or alter the human genome. This has taken the scientific community by storm and has led to moratorium meetings by the world’s leading scientists. The Chinese attempted to DNA edit using CRISPR/CAS9 to replace the genes that cause a blood disorder. The experiment failed due to the embryo not accepting the manifestation of the new genes, but ended up creating quite the buzz. Nonetheless, had this experiment succeeded this would have created drastic bounds and leaps in the future of genetic modification. The CRISPER/CAS9 technique has already proven useful in other organisms which thus led the Chinese to this experiment.
            I believe at this state and time that the world isn't ready to edit the human genome and is definitely considered unethical. Tinkering with our genes from a utilitarian standpoint could show some great benefits for humanities fight against disease and illness. Although, under Kant's ideology using our genome as a means to an end would certainly make this unjust.  The idea of genetic alteration has been expressed in the past with movies and television, but I feel like the general public was unaware with exactly how much of a reality it really is. I'm hoping that this failed experiment gives the topic a breath of fresh air and makes people aware that some serious decisions need to be made in the near future. With technologies such as this available, the next era of mankind is on the horizon.


Works Cited
Rosenstand, N. (2013). Personhood, Rights, and Justice. In The Moral Of The Story An Introduction To Ethics (7th ed., p. 321). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

No comments:

Post a Comment